I tam now tying to piece everything i have learnt and all the information i have gained into this essay.. and its hard.
In a way i feel that when it comes to invstigating a subject it is best to so something that you're passionate about but when it comes to essay writing it makes it hard to structure. I have posted the following from the handbook for me to keep refering back too.
Part 1: A Critical Review
Introduction - relevant to the context of the inquiry
and how it relates to your workplace or community of
practice
Evaluation of the Inquiry Process - practitioner
research tools used (observation, surveys,
interviews, focus groups), the literature review, the
ethical implications and other activities undertaken
as a part of the process (e.g. performances,
workshops, trying out new strategies, etc.)
Analysis of Findings - referencing relevant findings
and significance of inquiry including a discussion of
the literature in relation to the findings and the
benefits or implications of any activities undertaken
Critical Reflection - a critical self-analysis of the
learning journey based on your learning journal
The Critical Review should consist of 1 paper spiral
bound document (11pt, e.g. Ariel, double or 1 and ½
spacing) with indicative word counts listed below:
Title Page
Introduction – 500 words
Evaluation of the Inquiry Process – 2500 words
Analysis of the Findings – 2500 words
Critical Reflection – 500 words
Bibliography and Appendices
Supporting Evidence could consist of appendices
including: blog texts, visual evidence, blank consent
form, blank questionnaires, interview questions,
observation grids, etc. Please note: each appendix
should be cited (e.g. Appendix 1) in the Critical
Review (hyperlinks in digital version). Any online
materials must be accessible (e.g. Word or Pdf) or
available for download (dated prior to submission
date).
No comments:
Post a Comment